Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: max14577: Add max14577 MFD driver core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:08PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> +static irqreturn_t max14577_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct max14577 *max14577 = data;
> +	u8 irq_reg[MAX14577_IRQ_REGS_NUM] = {0};
> +	u8 tmp_irq_reg[MAX14577_IRQ_REGS_NUM] = {};
> +	int i, cur_irq;
> +
> +	max14577_bulk_read(max14577->regmap, MAX14577_REG_INT1,
> +			&tmp_irq_reg[MAX14577_IRQ_INT1],
> +			MAX14577_IRQ_REGS_NUM);

All this interrupt handling looks like a straight copy of the regmap
code?

> +int max14577_irq_resume(struct max14577 *max14577)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (max14577->irq && max14577->irq_domain)
> +		ret = max14577_irq_thread(0, max14577);

Are you sure that this is not going to race nastily if the interrupt
goes off during resume?

> +
> +	return ret >= 0 ? 0 : ret;

This check isn't a triumph of legibility.  

> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pdata)) {
> +		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "No platform data found: %ld\n",
> +				PTR_ERR(pdata));
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Why IS_ERR_OR_NULL().

> +#else
> +#define max14577_suspend	NULL
> +#define max14577_resume		NULL
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */

You don't need these since you use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS().

> +#else
> +#define max14577_dt_match	NULL
> +#endif

Similarly here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux