Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: ethtool: add support for configuring tcp-data-split-thresh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:47 AM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 12:33 PM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 3:25 AM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:07 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The tcp-data-split-thresh option configures the threshold value of
> > > > the tcp-data-split.
> > > > If a received packet size is larger than this threshold value, a packet
> > > > will be split into header and payload.
> > >
> > > Why do you need this? devmem TCP will always not work with unsplit
> > > packets. Seems like you always want to set thresh to 0 to support
> > > something like devmem TCP.
> > >
> > > Why would the user ever want to configure this? I can't think of a
> > > scenario where the user wouldn't want packets under X bytes to be
> > > unsplit.
> >
> > I totally understand what you mean,
> > Yes, tcp-data-split is zerocopy friendly option but as far as I know,
> > this option is not only for the zerocopy usecase.
> > So, If users enable tcp-data-split, they would assume threshold is 0.
> > But there are already NICs that have been supporting tcp-data-split
> > enabled by default.
> > bnxt_en's default value is 256bytes.
> > If we just assume the tcp-data-split-threshold to 0 for all cases,
> > it would change the default behavior of bnxt_en driver(maybe other drivers too)
> > for the not zerocopy case.
> > Jakub pointed out the generic case, not only for zerocopy usecase
> > in the v1 and I agree with that opinion.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240906183844.2e8226f3@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> I see, thanks. The ability to tune the threshold to save some pcie
> bandwidth is interesting. Not sure how much it would matter in
> practice. I guess if you're receiving _lots_ of small packets then it
> could be critical.
>
> Sounds good then, please consider adding Jakub's reasoning for why
> tuning this could be valuable to the commit message for future
> userspace readers that wonder why to set this.

Okay, I will add an explanation of this feature to commit message in v4 patch.

Thanks a lot!
Taehee Yoo

>
> --
> Thanks,
> Mina





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux