Hi Mark,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> +static int isl12057_i2c_read_regs(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 buf[],
>> + unsigned len)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_msg msgs[2] = {
>> + {
>> + .addr = client->addr,
>> + .flags = 0,
>> + .len = sizeof(u8),
>> + .buf = buf
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .addr = client->addr,
>> + .flags = I2C_M_RD,
>> + .len = len,
>> + .buf = buf
>> + }
>> + };
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(reg > ISL12057_REG_SR);
>> + BUG_ON(reg + len > ISL12057_REG_SR + 1);
>> +
>> + ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, 2);
>> + if (ret != 2)
>> + return ret;
>
> This might return 1.
>
> Given that in isl12057_rtc_read_time you check if the return value is
> negative (also indirectly via isl12057_i2c_validate_client), I think it
> would make sense to always either return a negative error code or 0.
Good catch. Will fix that and spend some more time on return paths, and
then send a v2.
Cheers,
a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
