On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:08:31PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Most of these submaintainers have their own trees where they stage patches, > sending pull requests to the main SoC tree. These trees are usually, but not > -always, listed in MAINTAINERS. The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the > -alias soc@xxxxxxxxxx if there is no platform-specific maintainer, or if they > -are unresponsive. > +always, listed in MAINTAINERS. I probably had some specific case in mind with that original wording. I presume it still holds true for some smaller platforms, but I cannot remember the specific case that prompted it. I'll have to see if I can figure out which platforms they are (if any) and get the tree added. Cheers, Conor. > What the SoC tree is not, however, is a location for architecture-specific code > changes. Each architecture has its own maintainers that are responsible for > architectural details, CPU errata and the like. > > +Submitting Patches for Given SoC > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + > +All usual platform related patches should be sent via SoC submaintainers > +(platform-specific maintainers. This includes also changes to per-platform or ^ this is unclosed. > +shared defconfigs (scripts/get_maintainer.pl might not provide correct > +addresses in such case).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
