On 8/29/24 21:40, Wesley Cheng wrote: > Allow for different platforms to be notified on USB SND connect/disconnect > sequences. This allows for platform USB SND modules to properly initialize > and populate internal structures with references to the USB SND chip > device. > > Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/usb/card.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > sound/usb/card.h | 10 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/sound/usb/card.c b/sound/usb/card.c > index 1f9dfcd8f336..7f120aa006c0 100644 > --- a/sound/usb/card.c > +++ b/sound/usb/card.c > @@ -118,6 +118,42 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(skip_validation, "Skip unit descriptor validation (default: no) > static DEFINE_MUTEX(register_mutex); > static struct snd_usb_audio *usb_chip[SNDRV_CARDS]; > static struct usb_driver usb_audio_driver; > +static struct snd_usb_platform_ops *platform_ops; > + > +/* > + * Register platform specific operations that will be notified on events > + * which occur in USB SND. The platform driver can utilize this path to > + * enable features, such as USB audio offloading, which allows for audio data > + * to be queued by an audio DSP. > + * > + * Only one set of platform operations can be registered to USB SND. The > + * platform register operation is protected by the register_mutex. > + */ > +int snd_usb_register_platform_ops(struct snd_usb_platform_ops *ops) > +{ > + guard(mutex)(®ister_mutex); > + if (platform_ops) > + return -EEXIST; > + > + platform_ops = ops; > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_usb_register_platform_ops); > + > +/* > + * Unregisters the current set of platform operations. This allows for Unregister? > + * a new set to be registered if required. > + * > + * The platform unregister operation is protected by the register_mutex. > + */ > +int snd_usb_unregister_platform_ops(void) > +{ > + guard(mutex)(®ister_mutex); > + platform_ops = NULL; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_usb_unregister_platform_ops); > > /* > * Checks to see if requested audio profile, i.e sample rate, # of > @@ -946,7 +982,11 @@ static int usb_audio_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > chip->num_interfaces++; > usb_set_intfdata(intf, chip); > atomic_dec(&chip->active); > + > + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->connect_cb) > + platform_ops->connect_cb(chip); > mutex_unlock(®ister_mutex); > + > return 0; > > __error: > @@ -983,6 +1023,9 @@ static void usb_audio_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) > card = chip->card; > > mutex_lock(®ister_mutex); > + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->disconnect_cb) > + platform_ops->disconnect_cb(chip); > + > if (atomic_inc_return(&chip->shutdown) == 1) { > struct snd_usb_stream *as; > struct snd_usb_endpoint *ep; > @@ -1130,6 +1173,11 @@ static int usb_audio_suspend(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message) > chip->system_suspend = chip->num_suspended_intf; > } > > + mutex_lock(®ister_mutex); > + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->suspend_cb) > + platform_ops->suspend_cb(intf, message); > + mutex_unlock(®ister_mutex); > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -1170,6 +1218,11 @@ static int usb_audio_resume(struct usb_interface *intf) > > snd_usb_midi_v2_resume_all(chip); > > + mutex_lock(®ister_mutex); > + if (platform_ops && platform_ops->resume_cb) > + platform_ops->resume_cb(intf); > + mutex_unlock(®ister_mutex); > + > out: > if (chip->num_suspended_intf == chip->system_suspend) { > snd_power_change_state(chip->card, SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0); > diff --git a/sound/usb/card.h b/sound/usb/card.h > index 4f4f3f39b7fa..23d9e6fc69e7 100644 > --- a/sound/usb/card.h > +++ b/sound/usb/card.h > @@ -207,7 +207,17 @@ struct snd_usb_stream { > struct list_head list; > }; > > +struct snd_usb_platform_ops { > + void (*connect_cb)(struct snd_usb_audio *chip); > + void (*disconnect_cb)(struct snd_usb_audio *chip); > + void (*suspend_cb)(struct usb_interface *intf, pm_message_t message); > + void (*resume_cb)(struct usb_interface *intf); > +}; You're using the same mutex to protect all four callbacks, so how would things work if e.g. you disconnected a device during the resume operation?