Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Fix grammar and phrasing errors in reporting-issues.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16.08.24 12:49, SurajSonawane2415 wrote:
> Fix grammatical errors and improve phrasing in the `reporting-issues.rst`
> documentation file. These changes enhance readability and ensure the
> accuracy of the instructions provided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SurajSonawane2415 <surajsonawane0215@xxxxxxxxx>

Ha, moving that "the" in the last change would not have been necessary
now that the "be" is gone, but whatever:

Acked-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thx again for this. Ciao, Thorsten

> ---
> V3 -> V4: Adjust line wrapping to split the long line properly.
> V2 -> V3: Re-added the fix for the line: "That's why you might be need to uninstall the".
> V1 -> V2: Removed the unwanted change to the line: "try search terms like".
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> index 2fd5a030235a..d0e645fc845a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ developers. It might be all that's needed for people already familiar with
>  reporting issues to Free/Libre & Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects. For
>  everyone else there is this section. It is more detailed and uses a
>  step-by-step approach. It still tries to be brief for readability and leaves
> -out a lot of details; those are described below the step-by-step guide in a
> +out a lot of details; those are described below in the step-by-step guide in a
>  reference section, which explains each of the steps in more detail. 
> 
>  Note: this section covers a few more aspects than the TL;DR and does things in
> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ face, even if they look small or totally unrelated. That's why you should report
>  issues with these kernels to the vendor. Its developers should look into the
>  report and, in case it turns out to be an upstream issue, fix it directly
>  upstream or forward the report there. In practice that often does not work out
> -or might not what you want. You thus might want to consider circumventing the
> +or might not be what you want. You thus might want to consider circumventing the
>  vendor by installing the very latest Linux kernel core yourself. If that's an
>  option for you move ahead in this process, as a later step in this guide will
>  explain how to do that once it rules out other potential causes for your issue.
> @@ -472,8 +472,8 @@ before proceeding.
>  Note, you might not be aware that your system is using one of these solutions:
>  they often get set up silently when you install Nvidia's proprietary graphics
>  driver, VirtualBox, or other software that requires a some support from a
> -module not part of the Linux kernel. That why your might need to uninstall the
> -packages with such software to get rid of any 3rd party kernel module.
> +module not part of the Linux kernel. That's why you might need to uninstall
> +the packages with such software to get rid of any 3rd party kernel module.
>  
>  
>  Check 'taint' flag




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux