Hi Jakub,
On 16/08/24 10:35 pm, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:56:10 +0530 Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>> +static void
>> +lan865x_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
>> +{
>> + strscpy(info->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(info->driver));
>> + strscpy(info->bus_info, dev_name(netdev->dev.parent),
>> + sizeof(info->bus_info));
>> +}
>> +
>
> Could you check if deleting this function has any effect?
> Core should fill in the basic info automatically, modern
> drivers usually only have to fill in FW version, if at all.
Ah ok, thanks for the info. I verified the output of "ethtool -i
<eth_device>" with and without of this function and as you mentioned,
got the same result in both the cases. So I will remove this function in
the next version.
>
> If without the callback ethtool -i doesn't report the right
> info, please make sure SET_NETDEV_DEV() gets called.
Yes, it is already called in the "oa_tc6_init()" function of
drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c file.
Best regards,
Parthiban V
>
