An unordered list in coding-guidelines.rst was indented, producing a blockquote around it and making it look more indented than expected. Remove the indentation to only output an unordered list. Reported-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1063 Fixes: d07479b211b7 ("docs: add Rust documentation") Signed-off-by: Vincent Woltmann <vincent@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes since v1: - Readded the last paragraph to the list, which was removed because I deleted too much indentation in v1 Documentation/rust/coding-guidelines.rst | 38 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/rust/coding-guidelines.rst b/Documentation/rust/coding-guidelines.rst index 05542840b16c..329b070a1d47 100644 --- a/Documentation/rust/coding-guidelines.rst +++ b/Documentation/rust/coding-guidelines.rst @@ -145,32 +145,32 @@ This is how a well-documented Rust function may look like: This example showcases a few ``rustdoc`` features and some conventions followed in the kernel: - - The first paragraph must be a single sentence briefly describing what - the documented item does. Further explanations must go in extra paragraphs. +- The first paragraph must be a single sentence briefly describing what + the documented item does. Further explanations must go in extra paragraphs. - - Unsafe functions must document their safety preconditions under - a ``# Safety`` section. +- Unsafe functions must document their safety preconditions under + a ``# Safety`` section. - - While not shown here, if a function may panic, the conditions under which - that happens must be described under a ``# Panics`` section. +- While not shown here, if a function may panic, the conditions under which + that happens must be described under a ``# Panics`` section. - Please note that panicking should be very rare and used only with a good - reason. In almost all cases, a fallible approach should be used, typically - returning a ``Result``. + Please note that panicking should be very rare and used only with a good + reason. In almost all cases, a fallible approach should be used, typically + returning a ``Result``. - - If providing examples of usage would help readers, they must be written in - a section called ``# Examples``. +- If providing examples of usage would help readers, they must be written in + a section called ``# Examples``. - - Rust items (functions, types, constants...) must be linked appropriately - (``rustdoc`` will create a link automatically). +- Rust items (functions, types, constants...) must be linked appropriately + (``rustdoc`` will create a link automatically). - - Any ``unsafe`` block must be preceded by a ``// SAFETY:`` comment - describing why the code inside is sound. +- Any ``unsafe`` block must be preceded by a ``// SAFETY:`` comment + describing why the code inside is sound. - While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded, - writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been - taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that - there are no *extra* implicit constraints. + While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded, + writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has been + taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know that + there are no *extra* implicit constraints. To learn more about how to write documentation for Rust and extra features, please take a look at the ``rustdoc`` book at: -- 2.41.0
