[PATCH] LKMP(Bug fixing fall 2024): Fix documentation spelling errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In this commit we correct some simple spelling mistakes
in the Documentation/arch directory.

1) "Assitance" to "Assistance"
2) "parant" to "parent"

Signed-off-by: Abhash Jha <abhashkumarjha123@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/arch/powerpc/ultravisor.rst | 2 +-
 Documentation/arch/riscv/vector.rst       | 2 +-
 Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst        | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/powerpc/ultravisor.rst b/Documentation/arch/powerpc/ultravisor.rst
index ba6b1bf1c..6d0407b2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/powerpc/ultravisor.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/powerpc/ultravisor.rst
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Hardware
 
       * PTCR and partition table entries (partition table is in secure
         memory). An attempt to write to PTCR will cause a Hypervisor
-        Emulation Assitance interrupt.
+        Emulation Assistance interrupt.
 
       * LDBAR (LD Base Address Register) and IMC (In-Memory Collection)
         non-architected registers. An attempt to write to them will cause a
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/vector.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/vector.rst
index 75dd88a62..e4a28def3 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/vector.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/vector.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ status for the use of Vector in userspace. The intended usage guideline for
 these interfaces is to give init systems a way to modify the availability of V
 for processes running under its domain. Calling these interfaces is not
 recommended in libraries routines because libraries should not override policies
-configured from the parant process. Also, users must noted that these interfaces
+configured from the parent process. Also, users must noted that these interfaces
 are not portable to non-Linux, nor non-RISC-V environments, so it is discourage
 to use in a portable code. To get the availability of V in an ELF program,
 please read :c:macro:`COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_V` bit of :c:macro:`ELF_HWCAP` in the
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
index 8895784d4..fd7999c4a 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ represents an ill-fated attempt from long time ago to put feature flags
 in an easy to find place for userspace.
 
 However, the amount of feature flags is growing by the CPU generation,
-leading to unparseable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo.
+leading to unparsable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo.
 
 What is more, those feature flags do not even need to be in that file
 because userspace doesn't care about them - glibc et al already use
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux