Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ALSA: timer: Introduce virtual userspace-driven timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:23:36 +0200,
Ivan Orlov wrote:
> +static int snd_utimer_ioctl_create(struct file *file,
> +				   struct snd_timer_uinfo __user *_utimer_info)
> +{
> +	struct snd_utimer *utimer;
> +	struct snd_timer_uinfo *utimer_info __free(kfree) = NULL;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	utimer_info = memdup_user(_utimer_info, sizeof(*utimer_info));
> +	if (IS_ERR(utimer_info))
> +		return PTR_ERR(no_free_ptr(utimer_info));
> +
> +	err = snd_utimer_create(utimer_info, &utimer);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	utimer_info->id = utimer->id;
> +
> +	err = copy_to_user(_utimer_info, utimer_info, sizeof(*utimer_info));
> +	if (err) {
> +		snd_utimer_free(utimer);
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return anon_inode_getfd(utimer->name, &snd_utimer_fops, utimer, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);

Wouldn't utimer be left unfreed if this returns an error?


thanks,

Takashi




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux