Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/08/2024 21:02, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:46:47PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
>> @@ -177,13 +177,56 @@ void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
>> +					  struct folio *folio,
>> +					  unsigned long idx)
>> +{
>> +	struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx);
>> +	bool contains_data;
>> +	pte_t newpte;
>> +	void *addr;
>> +
>> +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page), page);
>> +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
>> +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
>> +	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(*pvmw->pte), page);
>> +
>> +	if (PageMlocked(page) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The pmd entry mapping the old thp was flushed and the pte mapping
>> +	 * this subpage has been non present. If the subpage is only zero-filled
>> +	 * then map it to the shared zeropage.
>> +	 */
>> +	addr = kmap_local_page(page);
>> +	contains_data = memchr_inv(addr, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	kunmap_local(addr);
>> +
>> +	if (contains_data || mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(ZERO_PAGE(pvmw->address)),
>> +					pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot));
> 
> Why not use my_zero_pfn() here? On many configurations this just
> returns zero_pfn and avoids the indirection through mem_map.
> 
>> @@ -904,7 +958,7 @@ static int writeout(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
>>  	 * At this point we know that the migration attempt cannot
>>  	 * be successful.
>>  	 */
>> -	remove_migration_ptes(folio, folio, false);
>> +	remove_migration_ptes(folio, folio, false, false);
> 
> bool params are not great for callsite readability.
> 
> How about a flags parameter and using names?
> 
> enum rmp_flags {
> 	RMP_LOCKED	= 1 << 0,
> 	RMP_ZEROPAGES	= 1 << 1,
> }

Thanks! Will include both of the above changes in the next revision.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux