Daniel Yang <danielyangkang@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Signed-off-by: Daniel Yang <danielyangkang@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-crypt.rst | 15 ++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-crypt.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-crypt.rst > index e625830d335..552c9155165 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-crypt.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/device-mapper/dm-crypt.rst > @@ -162,13 +162,14 @@ iv_large_sectors > > > Module parameters:: > -max_read_size > -max_write_size > - Maximum size of read or write requests. When a request larger than this size > - is received, dm-crypt will split the request. The splitting improves > - concurrency (the split requests could be encrypted in parallel by multiple > - cores), but it also causes overhead. The user should tune these parameters to > - fit the actual workload. > + > + max_read_size > + max_write_size > + Maximum size of read or write requests. When a request larger than this size > + is received, dm-crypt will split the request. The splitting improves > + concurrency (the split requests could be encrypted in parallel by multiple > + cores), but it also causes overhead. The user should tune these parameters to > + fit the actual workload. Thanks for the patch. It would have been better to include a proper changelog, even for a simple change like this. Unfortunately, I got another fix for this error a few days ago, and have applied that. jon