Re: [PATCH v24 05/34] usb: host: xhci-mem: Cleanup pending secondary event ring events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/1/2024 3:17 AM, Wesley Cheng wrote:
As part of xHCI bus suspend, the XHCI is halted.  However, if there are

XHCI -> xHCI

pending events in the secondary event ring, it is observed that the xHCI
controller stops responding to further commands upon host or device
initiated bus resume.  Iterate through all pending events and update the
dequeue pointer to the beginning of the event ring.

Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c  |  7 ++++++-
  drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c      |  2 +-
  drivers/usb/host/xhci.h      |  6 ++++++
  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index 2ca5937b73f4..60dfc59260d8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ xhci_remove_interrupter(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_interrupter *ir)
  		tmp &= ERST_SIZE_MASK;
  		writel(tmp, &ir->ir_set->erst_size);
- xhci_write_64(xhci, ERST_EHB, &ir->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
+		xhci_update_erst_dequeue(xhci, ir, true);
  	}
  }
@@ -1859,6 +1859,11 @@ void xhci_remove_secondary_interrupter(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct xhci_interrup
  		return;
  	}
+ /*
+	 * Cleanup secondary interrupter to ensure there are no pending events.
+	 * This also updates event ring dequeue pointer back to the start.
+	 */
+	xhci_skip_sec_intr_events(xhci, ir->event_ring, ir);
  	intr_num = ir->intr_num;
xhci_remove_interrupter(xhci, ir);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 80dca780317a..a012ddf94fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -3012,7 +3012,7 @@ static int xhci_handle_event_trb(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_interrupter
   * - When all events have finished
   * - To avoid "Event Ring Full Error" condition
   */
-static void xhci_update_erst_dequeue(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
+void xhci_update_erst_dequeue(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
  				     struct xhci_interrupter *ir,
  				     bool clear_ehb)
  {
@@ -3112,6 +3112,37 @@ static int xhci_handle_events(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_interrupter *ir
  	return 0;
  }
+/*
+ * Move the event ring dequeue pointer to skip events kept in the secondary
+ * event ring.  This is used to ensure that pending events in the ring are
+ * acknowledged, so the XHCI HCD can properly enter suspend/resume.  The

XHCI -> xHCI

+ * secondary ring is typically maintained by an external component.
+ */
+void xhci_skip_sec_intr_events(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
+	struct xhci_ring *ring,	struct xhci_interrupter *ir)
+{
+	union xhci_trb *current_trb;
+	u64 erdp_reg;
+	dma_addr_t deq;
+
+	/* disable irq, ack pending interrupt and ack all pending events */
+	xhci_disable_interrupter(ir);

That seems like a bit weird place to disable interrupter? Perhaps suspend and resume functions should be updated to handle more interrupters instead?





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux