Hi Babu,
On 7/17/24 8:22 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
On 7/12/24 17:16, Reinette Chatre wrote:
On 7/3/24 2:48 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
+ */
+ if (rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[0] != MON_CNTR_UNSET)
+ if (!rdtgroup_abmc_dom_state(d, rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[0],
rdtgrp->mon.rmid))
+ dom_state |= ASSIGN_TOTAL;
+
+ if (rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[1] != MON_CNTR_UNSET)
+ if (!rdtgroup_abmc_dom_state(d, rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[1],
rdtgrp->mon.rmid))
+ dom_state |= ASSIGN_LOCAL;
+
+ switch (dom_state) {
+ case ASSIGN_NONE:
+ *tmp++ = '_';
+ break;
+ case (ASSIGN_TOTAL | ASSIGN_LOCAL):
+ *tmp++ = 't';
+ *tmp++ = 'l';
+ break;
+ case ASSIGN_TOTAL:
+ *tmp++ = 't';
+ break;
+ case ASSIGN_LOCAL:
+ *tmp++ = 'l';
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
This switch statement does not scale. Adding new flags will be painful.
Can flags not
just incrementally be printed as learned from hardware with "_" printed as
last resort?
This would elimininate need for these "ASSIGN" flags.
Let me try to understand this.
You want to remove switch statement.
if (rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[0] != MON_CNTR_UNSET)
if (!rdtgroup_abmc_dom_state(d, rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[0], rdtgrp->mon.rmid))
*tmp++ = 't';
if (rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[1] != MON_CNTR_UNSET)
if (!rdtgroup_abmc_dom_state(d, rdtgrp->mon.cntr_id[1], rdtgrp->mon.rmid))
*tmp++ = 'l';
If none of these flags are available, then
*tmp++ = '_';
Is that the idea?
Indeed. Thank you. Can this be done without hard coding the counter index?
Reinette
