Hi Grygorii,
Thanks for the review.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar Lad,
>
>
> On 11/02/2013 05:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> From: KV Sujith <sujithkv@xxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds OF parser support for davinci gpio
>> driver and also appropriate documentation in gpio-davinci.txt
>> located at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/.
>
>
> I worry, do we need to have gpio_chip.of_xlate() callback implemented?
I looked for the other OF GPIO implementations with same "ngpio"
property (marvel, msm) but I don’t see of_xlate() callback implemented.
> - From one side, Davinci GPIO controller in DT described by one entry
> which defines number of supported GPIOs as "ti,ngpio = <144>;"
>
> - From other side, on Linux level more than one gpio_chip objects are
> instantiated (one per each 32 GPIO).
>
> How the standard GPIO biding will work in this case? .. And will they?
>
> Linus, I'd very appreciate if you will be able to clarify this point.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: KV Sujith <sujithkv@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Avinash <avinashphilip@xxxxxx>
>> [prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx: simplified the OF code, removed
>> unnecessary DT property and also simplified
>> the commit message]
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 32 ++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 54
>> ++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..55aae1c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +Davinci GPIO controller bindings
>> +
>> +Required Properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio"
>> +
>> +- reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory
>> mapped
>> + registers.
>> +
>> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
>> +
>> +- interrupts: Array of GPIO interrupt number.
>
>
> May be meaning of <interrupts> property need to be extended, because,
> as of now, only banked or unbanked IRQs are supported - and not both.
>
>
OK
>> +
>> +- ti,ngpio: The number of GPIO pins supported.
>> +
>> +- ti,davinci-gpio-unbanked: The number of GPIOs that have an individual
>> interrupt
>> + line to processor.
>
>
> Should interrupt-controller; specifier be added here?
>
No
>
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +gpio: gpio@1e26000 {
>> + compatible = "ti,dm6441-gpio";
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + reg = <0x226000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <42 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH 43 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
>> + 44 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH 45 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
>> + 46 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH 47 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
>> + 48 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH 49 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
>> + 50 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
>> + ti,ngpio = <144>;
>> + ti,davinci-gpio-irq-base = <101>;
>
>
> ^^ Is it still needed?
>
OOps missed to remove that.
Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
