Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes: > Since v6.8 the definition of GFP_NOWAIT has implied __GFP_NOWARN, > so it is now redundant to add this flag explicitly. > > Update the docs to match, and emphasise the need for a fallback > when using GFP_NOWAIT. > > Fixes: 16f5dfbc851b ("gfp: include __GFP_NOWARN in GFP_NOWAIT") > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Based on: v6.11-rc1 > > This change also evaporates the apparent typo of __GFP_NOWARN without > the underscores in the documentation, but that doesn't really feel like > it merits a dedicated patch. > > Not sure if this really merits a Fixes tag, but the docmuentation > update might as well be picked into trees that have the corresponding > code change. > > --- > Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst > index 8b84eb4bdae7..0f19dd524323 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst > @@ -45,8 +45,9 @@ here we briefly outline their recommended usage: > * If the allocation is performed from an atomic context, e.g interrupt > handler, use ``GFP_NOWAIT``. This flag prevents direct reclaim and > IO or filesystem operations. Consequently, under memory pressure > - ``GFP_NOWAIT`` allocation is likely to fail. Allocations which > - have a reasonable fallback should be using ``GFP_NOWARN``. > + ``GFP_NOWAIT`` allocation is likely to fail. Users of this flag need > + to provide a suitable fallback to cope with such failures where > + appropriate. > * If you think that accessing memory reserves is justified and the kernel Applied, thanks. jon