Hi Prabhakar Lad,
On 11/02/2013 05:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch converts the davinci gpio driver to use irqdomain
> support.
This patch needs to be splitted in two:
1) add IRQ domain support
2) remove intc_irq_num
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h | 3 +-
> 8 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
[...]
>
> int __init dm646x_gpio_register(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 95c6df1..bcb6d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
>
> @@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> __raw_writel(status, &g->intstat);
>
> /* now demux them to the right lowlevel handler */
> - n = d->irq_base;
> + n = irq_find_mapping(d->irq_domain, 0);
Sorry, but I don't understand why have you used <0> as hwirq?
All below logic may not work in case if we switch to use Linear IRQ domain :(
- irq_create_mapping() may return ANY Linux IRQ number. It means, for
example, for bank0(ngpio=32)[0] it may return Linux_IRQ=200 or 201 or any other.
Also, for bank3(ngpio=16)[0] it may return Linux_IRQ=150, etc.
- More over, if you call irq_create_mapping() 32 times you may NOT get
sequential Linux_IRQ numbers.
So, the better sequence here can be smth. as below
(I can't verify it - my HW support only unbanked IRQs):
if (irq & 1)
mask <<= 16;
while (1) {
u32 status;
int bit;
/* ack any irqs */
status = __raw_readl(&g->intstat) & mask;
if (!status)
break;
__raw_writel(status, &g->intstat);
/* now demux them to the right lowlevel handler */
while (status) {
bit = __ffs(status);
status &= ~(1 << bit);
generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(d->irq_domain, bit));
}
}
> if (irq & 1) {
> n += 16;
> status >>= 16;
> @@ -313,10 +314,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_banked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> {
> struct davinci_gpio_controller *d = chip2controller(chip);
>
> - if (d->irq_base >= 0)
> - return d->irq_base + offset;
> - else
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return irq_find_mapping(d->irq_domain, offset);
I think you can use irq_create_mapping() here instead of
irq_find_mapping(), so IRQ will be mapped/allocated on demand.
Also, it seems, above code may crash in case if SoC has >1 GPIO banks and
gpio_unbanked > 0 and someone will call gpio_to_irq(>31).
> }
>
> static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> @@ -373,6 +371,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
> + int gpio_irq = 0;
>
> ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> @@ -402,9 +401,15 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; bank++, gpio += 32) {
> chips[bank].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_banked;
> - chips[bank].irq_base = pdata->gpio_unbanked
> - ? -EINVAL
> - : (pdata->intc_irq_num + gpio);
> + if (!pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
> + chips[bank].irq_domain =
> + irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, 32,
Use chips[i].chip.ngpio here instead of const 32?
> + &irq_domain_simple_ops,
Pass &davinci_gpio_irq_ops (see below)
> + NULL);
Pass &chips[bank] as host_data and use .map() callback (see below)
> +
> + if (!chips[bank].irq_domain)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -445,9 +450,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * Or, AINTC can handle IRQs for banks of 16 GPIO IRQs, which we
> * then chain through our own handler.
> */
> - for (gpio = 0, irq = gpio_to_irq(0), bank = 0;
> - gpio < ngpio;
> - bank++, bank_irq++) {
> + for (gpio = 0, irq = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; bank++, bank_irq++) {
> unsigned i;
>
> /* disabled by default, enabled only as needed */
> @@ -465,12 +468,22 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> */
> irq_set_handler_data(bank_irq, &chips[gpio / 32]);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 16 && gpio < ngpio; i++, irq++, gpio++) {
> - irq_set_chip(irq, &gpio_irqchip);
> - irq_set_chip_data(irq, (__force void *)g);
> - irq_set_handler_data(irq, (void *)__gpio_mask(gpio));
> - irq_set_handler(irq, handle_simple_irq);
> - set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
> + if (!(bank % 2))
> + irq = 0;
> + else
> + irq = 16;
As I mentioned above, I think, it is not good to play with IRQ numbers here.
Only chained IRQs and <binten> can be configured in this cycle.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 16 && gpio < ngpio; i++, gpio++) {
> + int irqno =
> + irq_create_mapping(chips[gpio / 32].irq_domain,
> + i + irq);
> +
> + irq_set_chip(irqno, &gpio_irqchip);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irqno, (__force void *)g);
> + irq_set_handler_data(irqno, (void *)__gpio_mask(gpio));
> + irq_set_handler(irqno, handle_simple_irq);
> + set_irq_flags(irqno, IRQF_VALID);
It makes no sense to manually create mapping. Usually it can be done in
.map() callback of IRQ domain. Like:
static int davinci_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chip = d->host_data;
unsigned gpio = chip->chip.base + hw;
irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &gpio_irqchip, handle_simple_irq,
"davinci_gpio");
irq_set_irq_type(irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
...
return 0;
}
static const struct irq_domain_ops davinci_gpio_irq_ops = {
.map = davinci_gpio_irq_map,
.xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
};
> + gpio_irq++;
> }
>
> binten |= BIT(bank);
> @@ -483,7 +496,7 @@ done:
> */
> __raw_writel(binten, gpio_base + BINTEN);
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "DaVinci: %d gpio irqs\n", irq - gpio_to_irq(0));
> + pr_info("DaVinci: %d gpio irqs\n", gpio_irq);
>
> return 0;
> }
[...]
> spinlock_t lock;
> void __iomem *regs;
>
start
Regards,
- grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
