On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:05:02AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On 24/07/24 23:39, Hall, Christopher S wrote: > > Hello Rodolfo, > > > > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 2:37 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > > > > > > On 15/07/24 10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 04 2024 at 13:50, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > > > > > On 03/07/24 16:47, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A gentle reminder for the review of the pps patchset. > > > > > > > > > > I already acked these patchset, didn't I? =8-o > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if I missed something. > > > > > > > > Sorry, I missed that V10 posting. It's too late now. > > > > > > > > Rodolfo, can you pick it up after rc1 for the next merge window. All > > > > prerequisites should be in Linus tree then. > > > > > > LinuxPPS has no dedicated tree as other Linux subsystems. Usually I send my > > > "Acked" to Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, and they push patches > > > by > > > themselves. > > > > Is the PPS driver on track to be included in the 6.11 release candidate? > > I hope so! ^_^" Are the patches in linux-next? If so, what tree did they go through? If not, they can't be merged into 6.11-rc1. > Unluckily the LinuxPPS is a minor subsystem with no dedicated tree, and > inclusion is not under my control. I pick up many "smaller" driver subsystems all the time, I just have to be asked to do so... thanks, greg k-h
