Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,

Thanks for the thorough review!

I'll send a rebased version addressing your comments in a moment.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:29 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for pursuing this! A couple of comments below.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 07:55:53PM -0400, David Finkel wrote:
> > @@ -1322,11 +1322,16 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
> >       reclaim induced by memory.reclaim.
> >
> >    memory.peak
> > -     A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
> > -     cgroups.
> > +     A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
> > +
> > +     The max memory usage recorded for the cgroup and its descendants since
> > +     either the creation of the cgroup or the most recent reset for that FD.
> >
> > -     The max memory usage recorded for the cgroup and its
> > -     descendants since the creation of the cgroup.
> > +     A write of the string "reset" to this file resets it to the
> > +     current memory usage for subsequent reads through the same
> > +     file descriptor.
> > +     Attempts to write any other non-empty string will return EINVAL
> > +     (modulo leading and trailing whitespace).
>
> Why not allow any write to reset? This makes it harder to use, and I'm
> not sure accidental writes are a likely mistake to make.

Accepting any string is a rather wide interface, and since actually empty writes
get dropped before this handler is invoked, I think allowing any write
is more confusing.

I figured that a narrower interface is a better starting point, as
long as it's correctly
documented.

We can always widen it to all writes later, but we can't go the other way.

>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > index 2150ca60394b..7001ed74e339 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <linux/rculist.h>
> >  #include <linux/cgroupstats.h>
> >  #include <linux/fs.h>
> > @@ -855,4 +856,11 @@ static inline void cgroup_bpf_put(struct cgroup *cgrp) {}
> >
> >  struct cgroup *task_get_cgroup1(struct task_struct *tsk, int hierarchy_id);
> >
> > +struct memcg_peak_mem_ctx {
> > +     long                            local_watermark;
> > +     struct list_head                peers;
> > +};
>
> Since this is generic cgroup code, and can be conceivably used by
> other controllers, let's keep the naming generic as well. How about:
>
> struct cgroup_of_peak {
>         long                    value;
>         struct list_head        list;
> };
>
> cgroup-defs.h would be a better place for it.
That is much less jarring.

>
> > +struct memcg_peak_mem_ctx *memcg_extract_peak_mem_ctx(struct kernfs_open_file *of);
>
> of_peak()
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > index 030d34e9d117..cbc390234605 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> >       struct page_counter kmem;               /* v1 only */
> >       struct page_counter tcpmem;             /* v1 only */
> >
> > +     /* lists of memcg peak watching contexts on swap and memory */
> > +     struct list_head peak_memory_local_watermark_watchers;
> > +     struct list_head peak_swap_local_watermark_watchers;
> > +     spinlock_t swap_memory_peak_watchers_lock;
>
> These names are too long. How about:
>
>         /* Registered local usage peak watchers */
>         struct list_head        memory_peaks;
>         struct list_head        swap_peaks;
>         spinlock_t              peaks_lock;
>
That's much better.
(sometimes when I'm unsure about a name, I default to a terrible, long name
with way too much information)

> > diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> > index 8cd858d912c4..06bb84218960 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct page_counter {
> >       atomic_long_t children_low_usage;
> >
> >       unsigned long watermark;
> > +     unsigned long local_watermark; /* track min of fd-local resets */
> >       unsigned long failcnt;
> >
> >       /* Keep all the read most fields in a separete cacheline. */
> > @@ -78,7 +79,15 @@ int page_counter_memparse(const char *buf, const char *max,
> >
> >  static inline void page_counter_reset_watermark(struct page_counter *counter)
> >  {
> > -     counter->watermark = page_counter_read(counter);
> > +     unsigned long cur = page_counter_read(counter);
>
> cur -> usage
That's a better name.

>
> > @@ -6907,12 +6912,109 @@ static u64 memory_current_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> >       return (u64)page_counter_read(&memcg->memory) * PAGE_SIZE;
> >  }
> >
> > -static u64 memory_peak_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> > -                         struct cftype *cft)
> > +inline int swap_memory_peak_show(
> > +     struct seq_file *sf, void *v, bool swap_cg)
> >  {
>
> Leave inlining to the compiler. Just static int.
>
> The name can be simply peak_show().

Oh, right, I forgot that since this is local to the translation-unit
it doesn't need to be globally unique.

>
> Customary coding style is to line wrap at the last parameter that
> fits. Don't wrap if the line fits within 80 cols.
>
> static int peak_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v, ...,
>                      ...)
> {
>         ...
> }
>
Oh yeah, I forgot to move those back to one line when I got rid of the
callback args
while addressing Roman's comments.
Thanks for pointing that out.

> > +     struct cgroup_subsys_state *css = seq_css(sf);
> >       struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
> > +     struct page_counter *pc;
> > +     struct kernfs_open_file *of = sf->private;
> > +     struct memcg_peak_mem_ctx *ctx = memcg_extract_peak_mem_ctx(of);
> > +     s64 fd_peak = ctx->local_watermark;
> >
> > -     return (u64)memcg->memory.watermark * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +     if (swap_cg)
> > +             pc = &memcg->swap;
> > +     else
> > +             pc = &memcg->memory;
> > +
> > +     if (fd_peak == -1) {
> > +             seq_printf(sf, "%llu\n", (u64)pc->watermark * PAGE_SIZE);
> > +             return 0;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     s64 pc_peak = pc->local_watermark;
> > +     s64 wm = fd_peak > pc_peak ? fd_peak : pc_peak;
> > +
> > +     seq_printf(sf, "%lld\n", wm * PAGE_SIZE);
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> As per Roman's feedback, don't mix decls and code.

Sorry, that one slipped through. (I've now fixed my syntax highlighting
to recognize s64 as a type)

>
> You can simplify it by extracting css and memcg in the callers, then
> pass the right struct page counter *pc directly.
>
> That should eliminate most local variables as well.
>
> static int peak_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v, struct page_counter *pc)
> {
>         struct cgroup_of_peak *ofp = of_peak(sf->private);
>         u64 peak;
>
>         /* User wants global or local peak? */
>         if (ofp->value == -1)
>                 peak = pc->watermark;
>         else
>                 peak = max(ofp->value, pc->local_watermark);
>
>         seq_printf(sf, "%lld\n", peak * PAGE_SIZE);
> }
>
> > +static int memory_peak_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
> > +{
> > +     return swap_memory_peak_show(sf, v, false);
>
> And then do:
>
>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(seq_css(sf));
>
>         return peak_show(sf, v, &memcg->memory);
>
> Then do the same with ... &memcg->swap.
That is much cleaner!
Thanks!
>
> > +inline ssize_t swap_memory_peak_write(
> > +     struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> > +     char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off, bool swap_cg)
> > +{
>
> Same feedback as above. Please don't inline explicitly (unless it
> really is measurably a performance improvement in a critical path),
> and stick to surrounding coding style.
>
> Here too, pass page_counter directly and save the branches.
>
> > +     unsigned long cur;
> > +     struct memcg_peak_mem_ctx *peer_ctx;
> > +     struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
> > +     struct memcg_peak_mem_ctx *ctx = memcg_extract_peak_mem_ctx(of);
> > +     struct page_counter *pc;
> > +     struct list_head *watchers, *pos;
> > +
> > +     buf = strstrip(buf);
> > +     /* Only allow "reset" to keep the API clear */
> > +     if (strcmp(buf, "reset"))
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (swap_cg) {
> > +             pc = &memcg->swap;
> > +             watchers = &memcg->peak_swap_local_watermark_watchers;
> > +     } else {
> > +             pc = &memcg->memory;
> > +             watchers = &memcg->peak_memory_local_watermark_watchers;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     spin_lock(&memcg->swap_memory_peak_watchers_lock);
> > +
> > +     page_counter_reset_local_watermark(pc);
> > +     cur = pc->local_watermark;
> > +
> > +     list_for_each(pos, watchers) {
>
>         list_for_each_entry()
Oh, I missed that one. Thanks!

>
> > +             peer_ctx = list_entry(pos, typeof(*ctx), peers);
> > +             if (cur > peer_ctx->local_watermark)
> > +                     peer_ctx->local_watermark = cur;
> > +     }
>
> I don't think this is quite right. local_peak could be higher than the
> current usage when a new watcher shows up. The other watchers should
> retain the higher local_peak, not the current usage.

Since we have to iterate over the list entries while holding the spinlock,
I think we avoid that kind of mismatch by keeping the assignments
inside that critical section as well. (and eliminate a few other races)

As-is, we get a snapshot value of the current usage and use that for
the rest of the function while holding the lock, so, those fd-local
watermarks will only change by assignments in this function.

On the other hand, pc->local_watermark may keep increasing, but that's fine.

>
> > +
> > +     if (ctx->local_watermark == -1)
> > +             /* only append to the list if we're not already there */
> > +             list_add_tail(&ctx->peers, watchers);
> > +
> > +     ctx->local_watermark = cur;
>
> This makes me think that page_counter_reset_local_watermark() is not a
> good helper. It obscures what's going on. Try without it.
>
> AFAICS the list ordering doesn't matter, so keep it simple and use a
> plain list_add().
>
>         /*
>          * A new local peak is being tracked in pc->local_watermark.
>          * Save current local peak in all watchers.
>          */
>         list_for_each_entry(pos, ...)
>                 if (pc->local_watermark > pos->value)
>                         pos->value = pc->local_watermark;
>
>         pc->local_watermark = page_counter_read(pc);
>
>         /* Initital write, register watcher */
>         if (ofp->value == -1)
>                 list_add()
>
>         ofp->value = pc->local_watermark;
>
> > diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
> > index db20d6452b71..724d31508664 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_counter.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_counter.c
> > @@ -79,9 +79,22 @@ void page_counter_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages)
> >               /*
> >                * This is indeed racy, but we can live with some
> >                * inaccuracy in the watermark.
> > +              *
> > +              * Notably, we have two watermarks to allow for both a globally
> > +              * visible peak and one that can be reset at a smaller scope.
> > +              *
> > +              * Since we reset both watermarks when the global reset occurs,
> > +              * we can guarantee that watermark >= local_watermark, so we
> > +              * don't need to do both comparisons every time.
> > +              *
> > +              * On systems with branch predictors, the inner condition should
> > +              * be almost free.
> >                */
> > -             if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark))
> > -                     WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new);
> > +             if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) {
> > +                     WRITE_ONCE(c->local_watermark, new);
> > +                     if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark))
> > +                             WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new);
> > +             }
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -131,10 +144,23 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page_counter *counter,
> >               propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
> >               /*
> >                * Just like with failcnt, we can live with some
> > -              * inaccuracy in the watermark.
> > +              * inaccuracy in the watermarks.
> > +              *
> > +              * Notably, we have two watermarks to allow for both a globally
> > +              * visible peak and one that can be reset at a smaller scope.
> > +              *
> > +              * Since we reset both watermarks when the global reset occurs,
> > +              * we can guarantee that watermark >= local_watermark, so we
> > +              * don't need to do both comparisons every time.
> > +              *
> > +              * On systems with branch predictors, the inner condition should
> > +              * be almost free.
>
>                 /* See comment in page_counter_charge() */
Even better!
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> > index 432db923bced..1e2d46636a0c 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> > @@ -141,6 +141,16 @@ long cg_read_long(const char *cgroup, const char *control)
> >       return atol(buf);
> >  }
>
> This should be in patch #2.
:facepalm: that's what I get for trying to split this and send it out
at the end of the day.



-- 
David Finkel
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Core Services





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux