On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:24:49PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:48:40PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > ... > > How about letting .peak shows two numbers? The first one is the peak since > > the creation of the cgroup and cannot be reset. The second one is a local > > maximum that can be reset to 0. We just to keep track of one more counter > > that should be simple enough to implement. > > What Johannes suggested seems to hit all the marks - it's efficient and > relatively simple, the overhead is only on the users of the facility, and > flexible in a straightforward manner. I have a hard time buying the argument > that it's more difficult to use - the benefit to cost ratio seems pretty > clear. Given that, I'm not sure why we'd want to add something fishy that > can lead to longterm problems. +1 to that. I really like Johannes's suggestion. Thanks
