On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 01:34:41PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在2024年7月9日七月 下午4:55，Thomas Bogendoerfer写道：
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 01:33:06AM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 在2024年6月27日六月 下午8:54，Maciej W. Rozycki写道：
> >> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> >> @@ -318,6 +318,10 @@ void mips_set_personality_nan(struct arch_elf_state *state)
> >> >> >> t->thread.fpu.fcr31 = c->fpu_csr31;
> >> >> >> switch (state->nan_2008) {
> >> >> >> case 0:
> >> >> >> + if (!(c->fpu_msk31 & FPU_CSR_NAN2008))
> >> >> >> + t->thread.fpu.fcr31 &= ~FPU_CSR_NAN2008;
> >> >> >> + if (!(c->fpu_msk31 & FPU_CSR_ABS2008))
> >> >> >> + t->thread.fpu.fcr31 &= ~FPU_CSR_ABS2008;
> >> >> >
> >> >> > why is this needed?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because t->thread.fpu.fcr31 comes from c->fpu_csr31, in this case we the default
> >> >> value of c->fpu_csr31 is read from hardware and we don't know what would that be.
> >> >
> >> > But it has always been like this. What has changed with your patch that
> >> > you need to mask the bit out now?
> >>
> >> After this patch kernel's copy of t->thread.fpu.fcr31 can disagree with hardware.
> >> When disagree happens, we trigger emulation.
> >>
> >> Before that patch for nan legacy binary running on nan2008 CPU t->thread.fpu.fcr31
> >> will still be nan2008 (for ieee754=relaxed) so that's not relevant.
> >
> > I'm considering to apply your patch, how much testing/verification did
> > this patch see ? Do have some test binaries ?
>
> It has been tested against Debian rootfs. There is no need to test againt special binary,
> but you need NaN2008 hardware such as Loongson 3A4000.
that's just one case, what about NaN2008 binaries on a legacy MIPS CPU ?
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
