Hi Sascha,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 02:51:43PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Look at drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c:
>
> > /**
> > * struct sdma_firmware_header - Layout of the firmware image
> > *
> > * @magic "SDMA"
> > * @version_major increased whenever layout of struct
> > * sdma_script_start_addrs
> > * changes.
>
> Can you image why this firmware has a version field? Right, it's because
> it encodes the layout of struct sdma_script_start_addrs.
>
> As the comment clearly states you have to *increase this field* when you
> add scripts.
>
> Obviously you missed that, as the firmware on lkml posted recently
> shows:
>
> > 00000000: 414d4453 00000001 00000001 0000001c SDMA............
> ^^^^^^^^
> Still '1'
>
> > 00000010: 00000026 000000b4 0000067a 00000282 &.......z.......
> > 00000020: ffffffff 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff ................
> > 00000030: ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ................
> > 00000040: ffffffff ffffffff 00001a6a ffffffff ........j.......
> > 00000050: 000002eb 000018bb ffffffff 00000408 ................
> > 00000060: ffffffff 000003c0 ffffffff ffffffff ................
> > 00000070: ffffffff 000002ab ffffffff 0000037b ............{...
> > 00000080: ffffffff ffffffff 0000044c 0000046e ........L...n...
> > 00000090: ffffffff 00001800 ffffffff ffffffff ................
> > 000000a0: 00000000 00001800 00001862 00001a16 ........b.......
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> new script addresses introduced
>
>
> > -#define SDMA_SCRIPT_ADDRS_ARRAY_SIZE_V1 34
> > +#define SDMA_SCRIPT_ADDRS_ARRAY_SIZE_V1 37
>
> And no, this is not a bug. It's your firmware header that is buggy.
>
I wasn't aware that the problem is far more complicated than I thought.
And thank you for telling me all this.
> What you need is:
>
> #define SDMA_SCRIPT_ADDRS_ARRAY_SIZE_V2 37
>
> You (you as a company, not you as a person) knew that it was me who
> created this firmware format. So it was absolutely unnecessary to create
> an incompatible firmware instead of dropping me a short note.
>
> Please add a version check to the driver as necessary and provide a proper
> firmware.
>
Just currently it's not easy for me to create a new proper firmware,
and I's been told that besides this version number, it also lacks a
decent license info. So may I just refine this patch as you suggested
to add a version check and add those new scripts first?
Thank you,
Nicolin Chen
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
