-#define __arch_xchg_masked(sc_sfx, prepend, append, r, p, n) \
+#define __arch_xchg_masked(sc_sfx, swap_sfx, prepend, sc_append, \
+ swap_append, r, p, n) \
({ \
+ __label__ zabha, end; \
+ \
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA)) { \
+ asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %[zabha]", 0, \
+ RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZABHA, 1) \
+ : : : : zabha); \
+ } \
+ \
u32 *__ptr32b = (u32 *)((ulong)(p) & ~0x3); \
ulong __s = ((ulong)(p) & (0x4 - sizeof(*p))) * BITS_PER_BYTE; \
ulong __mask = GENMASK(((sizeof(*p)) * BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1, 0) \
@@ -28,12 +37,25 @@
" or %1, %1, %z3\n" \
" sc.w" sc_sfx " %1, %1, %2\n" \
" bnez %1, 0b\n" \
- append \
+ sc_append \
: "=&r" (__retx), "=&r" (__rc), "+A" (*(__ptr32b)) \
: "rJ" (__newx), "rJ" (~__mask) \
: "memory"); \
\
r = (__typeof__(*(p)))((__retx & __mask) >> __s); \
+ goto end; \
+ \
+zabha: \
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA)) { \
+ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
+ prepend \
+ " amoswap" swap_sfx " %0, %z2, %1\n" \
+ swap_append \
+ : "=&r" (r), "+A" (*(p)) \
+ : "rJ" (n) \
+ : "memory"); \
+ } \
+end:; \
})
As for patch #1: why the semicolon? and should the second IS_ENABLED()
be kept?
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index e17d0078a651..f71ddd2ca163 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZTSO 72
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS 73
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XANDESPMU 74
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZABHA 75
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 5ef48cb20ee1..c125d82c894b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihintpause, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHINTPAUSE),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zacas, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zabha, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZABHA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFH),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zfhmin, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZFHMIN),
To be squashed into patch #3?
