On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:13:29PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: ... > The patch looks good to me after the atomic conversion. Sorry for bringing up > this question so late into the discussion. Given that misc.max is available > only for non-root cgroups, does it make sense for misc.peak too, available > for non-root cgroups only? It's more tied to the usage - misc.current. For memcg, memory.current is only on non-root cgroups, so is peak. For misc, as misc.current exists for the root cgroup, it makes sense for .peak to be there too. Thanks. -- tejun
