On Oct 28, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:42:47AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> +This binding is based on the matrix-keymap binding with the following >>> +changes: >> >> Maybe be a bit more specific and say 'based on the input/matrix-keymap.txt binding'.. > > OK. > >>> + * keypad,num-rows and keypad,num-columns are required. >> >> Is linux,keymap required from matrix-keymap.txt? > > Yes, matrix-keymap.txt contains descriptions for the following: > > required: > - linux,keymap So you don't say that linux,keymap is required for twl4030-keypad (wasn't clear if you assumed that or not). > optional: > - keypad,num-rows > - keypad,num-columns > >>> +Optional Properties specific to linux: >>> +- linux,keypad-no-autorepeat: do no enable autorepeat feature. >> >> Does it make sense to update the matrix-keymap.txt binding to add >> 'linux,keypad-no-autorepeat' there? > > At least according to devicetree documentation there are > keymap-matrix.txt based drivers, which do not support > "linux,keypad-no-autorepeat". Which is why it could be optional in keymap-matrix.txt. I dont know anything about keymap/keypad's just asking the question? It seems as if linux,keypad-no-autorepeat is intended to mean the same thing (if relevant to the device) across all drivers. Is that correct? If so it seems like moving it to be specified in a generic input binding makes sense, just not sure if keymap-matrix.txt is that place or not. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
