Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best practices for using Link trailers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/26/24 4:13 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 02:07:44PM GMT, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:24:07PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>>>> +   This URL should be used when referring to relevant mailing list
>>>> +   topics, related patch sets, or other notable discussion threads.
>>>> +   A convenient way to associate ``Link:`` trailers with the commit
>>>> +   message is to use markdown-like bracketed notation, for example::
>>>> ...
>>>> +     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/some-msgid@here # [1]
>>>> +     Link: https://bugzilla.example.org/bug/12345  # [2]
>>>
>>> Why are we adding the extra "# " characters? The vast majority of
>>> existing Link tags don't do this:
>>
>> That's just convention. In general, the hash separates the trailer from the
>> comment:
>>
>>     Trailer-name: actual-trailer-body # comment
>>
> 
> Did we ever come to a conclusion on this?  This one character seems to
> be the main source of disagreement in this series, I'm wondering if I
> should just apply it and let the painting continue thereafter...?

We have used '#' for ages for adding comments to by: tags.
I'm surprised that it's not documented.

-- 
~Randy




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux