On June 21, 2024 9:27:34 PM PDT, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Based on multiple conversations, most recently on the ksummit mailing >> list [1], add some best practices for using the Link trailer, such as: >> >> - how to use markdown-like bracketed numbers in the commit message to >> indicate the corresponding link >> - when to use lore.kernel.org vs patch.msgid.link domains >> >> Cc: ksummit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20240617-arboreal-industrious-hedgehog-5b84ae@meerkat # [1] >> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst >> index 64739968afa6..ba312345d030 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst >> @@ -372,17 +372,31 @@ following tag ordering scheme: >> >> - Link: ``https://link/to/information`` >> >> - For referring to an email on LKML or other kernel mailing lists, >> - please use the lore.kernel.org redirector URL:: >> + For referring to an email posted to the kernel mailing lists, please >> + use the lore.kernel.org redirector URL:: >> >> - https://lore.kernel.org/r/email-message@id >> + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/email-message-id@here >> >> - The kernel.org redirector is considered a stable URL, unlike other email >> - archives. >> + This URL should be used when referring to relevant mailing list >> + topics, related patch sets, or other notable discussion threads. >> + A convenient way to associate ``Link:`` trailers with the commit >> + message is to use markdown-like bracketed notation, for example:: >> >> - Maintainers will add a Link tag referencing the email of the patch >> - submission when they apply a patch to the tip tree. This tag is useful >> - for later reference and is also used for commit notifications. >> + A similar approach was attempted before as part of a different >> + effort [1], but the initial implementation caused too many >> + regressions [2], so it was backed out and reimplemented. >> + >> + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/some-msgid@here # [1] >> + Link: https://bugzilla.example.org/bug/12345 # [2] > >Does it actually make sense to use the Link: prefix here? These sort of >links are part of the prose, they're not something a script can download >and make any sense of. > >I see some existing usage of the above style, but equally there's lots >of examples of footnote-style links without the Link: tag, eg: I moved from that to using Link: because checkpatch would complain about my long (URL) lines unless it had a Link tag :P >commit 40b561e501768ef24673d0e1d731a7b9b1bc6709 >Merge: d9f843fbd45e 31611cc8faa0 >Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >Date: Mon Apr 29 22:29:44 2024 +0200 > > Merge tag 'tee-ts-for-v6.10' of https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee into soc/drivers > > TEE driver for Trusted Services > > This introduces a TEE driver for Trusted Services [1]. > > Trusted Services is a TrustedFirmware.org project that provides a > framework for developing and deploying device Root of Trust services in > FF-A [2] Secure Partitions. The project hosts the reference > implementation of Arm Platform Security Architecture [3] for Arm > A-profile devices. > > ... > > [1] https://www.trustedfirmware.org/projects/trusted-services/ > [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0077/ > [3] https://www.arm.com/architecture/security-features/platform-security > > >The above style is standard markdown style for reference links (or as >standard as markdown gets). It's a good point. If we're formalizing this, why not literally use markdown instead? (I guess the answer is that out-of-line links/footnotes isn't standardized.) Playing devil's advocate, outside of the kernel, these are the two most common styles I've seen: Foo[1] ... [1]: https://.... and Bar[^1] ... [^1] https://... Personally, I only want to have a single official way to do this, and don't care much what it is. I have a minor preference for what you've described: Baz[1] ... [1] https://... -Kees -- Kees Cook