On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:02:25 -0400, Matt Porter <matt.porter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 09:12:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:13:31 +0800, Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This adds the Document for Freescale FTM PWM driver under > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..2c6969a > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > > > +Freescale FTM PWM controller > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: Should be "fsl,vf610-ftm-pwm" > > > +- reg: Physical base address and length of the controller's registers > > > +- #pwm-cells: Should be 3. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of > > > + the cells format. > > > +- clock-names : Includes the following module clock source entries: > > > + "ftm0" (system clock), > > > + "ftm0_fix_sel" (fixed frequency clock), > > > + "ftm0_ext_sel" (external clock) > > > +- clocks : Must contain a clock specifier for each entry in clock-names. > > > +- fsl,pwm-counter-clk: The FTM PWM counter clock source, should be one of the > > > + entries in clock-names. > > > +- pinctrl-names: must contain a "default" entry. > > > +- pinctrl-NNN: One property must exist for each entry in pinctrl-names. > > > + See ../pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property values. > > > > Looks okay to me. > > For consistency, shouldn't it also have: > > "See ../clock/clock-bindings.txt for details of the property values" > > where appropriate like is done under the pwm/pinctrl uses? > > IMHO, referencing parent bindings all of the time should be a documented > best practice / requirement. I agree. In fact, it should be part of the requirements on schema tooling that we discussed last week at ksummit (email summary will be provided) g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html