在 2024-06-21星期五的 11:01 +0800,yunhui cui写道: > Hi Icenowy, > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 7:51 AM Icenowy Zheng <uwu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > 在 2024-06-18星期二的 18:11 +0100,Jessica Clarke写道: > > > On 18 Jun 2024, at 12:46, Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > A handful of user-visible behavior is based on the frequency of > > > > the > > > > machine-mode time. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I would suggest referring to the user-mode CSR instead, i.e. > > > “time” > > > rather than “mtime” throughout in names and descriptions, since > > > that’s > > > the thing that user-mode software is actually reading from. > > > > Agree. MTIME isn't even a thing defined in RISC-V ISA -- it's part > > of > > the ACLINT timer spec, but before ACLINT gets widely accepted, it's > > just some SiFive thing that got copied by many other vendors (and > > vendors such as T-Head even provides CLINT w/o MTIME register (well > > because these T-Head cores have reference source code available, > > this > > is because of their CPU design uses an external counter fed as TIME > > register)). > > Okay, Thanks for your suggestions, I think this modification is more > appropriate: > > RISC-V: Provide the frequency of time counter via hwprobe Sure, or you could just say time CSR, which is a defined CSR in the user ISA document, and allow to be read from userspace. > > A handful of user-visible behavior is based on the frequency of the > time counter. > > What do you think ? > > > > > > > > > Jess > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linux-riscv mailing list > > > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv > > > > Thanks, > Yunhui