Re: [PATCH net-next v2] docs: net: document guidance of implementing the SR-IOV NDOs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/19/24 5:27 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> New drivers were prevented from adding ndo_set_vf_* callbacks
> over the last few years. This was expected to result in broader
> switchdev adoption, but seems to have had little effect.
> 
> Based on recent netdev meeting there is broad support for allowing
> adding those ops.
> 
> There is a problem with the current API supporting a limited number
> of VFs (100+, which is less than some modern HW supports).
> We can try to solve it by adding similar functionality on devlink
> ports, but that'd be another API variation to maintain.
> So a netlink attribute reshuffling is a more likely outcome.
> 
> Document the guidance, make it clear that the API is frozen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
>  - edits from Randy
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240618192818.554646-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> CC: corbet@xxxxxxx
> CC: rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/index.rst |  1 +
>  Documentation/networking/sriov.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/sriov.rst

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
~Randy




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux