On Wed, 2024-06-12 at 17:04 +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > In prevision to add new UAPI for hwtstamp we will be limited to the struct > ethtool_ts_info that is currently passed in fixed binary format through the > ETHTOOL_GET_TS_INFO ethtool ioctl. It would be good if new kernel code > already started operating on an extensible kernel variant of that > structure, similar in concept to struct kernel_hwtstamp_config vs struct > hwtstamp_config. > > Since struct ethtool_ts_info is in include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h, here > we introduce the kernel-only structure in include/linux/ethtool.h. > The manual copy is then made in the function called by ETHTOOL_GET_TS_INFO. > > Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx> I think it would be nice if a few more vendors could actually step-in and test/ack the driver specific bits. Thanks, Paolo
