> I am wondering what the impact of this doc update is on my series[1]. I > am looking for a straightforward recommendation for what terminology I, > and hopefully others, should adopt *outside the i2c subsystem*, where > Linux (typically) has a driver for the controller and is communicating > with an unknown OS/firmware on the target. > > a) Spec-compliant "controller/target" > b) Linux implementation/spec hybrid "controller/client", or > c) Linux implementation "adapter/client" > > I prefer (a), FWIW, so do apparently reviewers on my series. I also prefer (a), but people should know what (c) means when they look around in the kernel source. I'll see how it goes with rewording this patch accordingly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
