On 10/17/2013 11:01 AM, Xiubo Li wrote: [...] > +static int fsl_sai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, > + struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = fsl_sai_hw_params_tr(substream, params, cpu_dai, > + FSL_FMT_TRANSMITTER); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(cpu_dai->dev, > + "Cannot set sai transmitter hw params: %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = fsl_sai_hw_params_tr(substream, params, cpu_dai, > + FSL_FMT_RECEIVER); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(cpu_dai->dev, > + "Cannot set sai's receiver hw params: %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } Shouldn't, depending on the substream direction, either transmit or receiver be configured, instead of always configuring both? > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int fsl_sai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd, > + struct snd_soc_dai *dai) > +{ > + struct fsl_sai *sai = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(dai); > + unsigned int tcsr, rcsr; > + > + tcsr = readl(sai->base + SAI_TCSR); > + rcsr = readl(sai->base + SAI_RCSR); > + > + switch (cmd) { > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_RESUME: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE: > + rcsr |= SAI_CSR_TERE | SAI_CSR_FRDE; > + tcsr |= SAI_CSR_TERE | SAI_CSR_FRDE; > + writel(rcsr, sai->base + SAI_RCSR); > + udelay(10); > + writel(tcsr, sai->base + SAI_TCSR); > + break; > + > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND: > + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH: > + tcsr &= ~(SAI_CSR_TERE | SAI_CSR_FRDE); > + rcsr &= ~(SAI_CSR_TERE | SAI_CSR_FRDE); > + writel(tcsr, sai->base + SAI_TCSR); > + udelay(10); > + writel(rcsr, sai->base + SAI_RCSR); > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + Same here, shouldn't tx and rx be started independently depending on the substream direction? > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct snd_soc_dai_ops fsl_sai_pcm_dai_ops = { const > + .set_sysclk = fsl_sai_set_dai_sysclk, > + .set_clkdiv = fsl_sai_set_dai_clkdiv, > + .set_fmt = fsl_sai_set_dai_fmt, > + .set_tdm_slot = fsl_sai_set_dai_tdm_slot, > + .hw_params = fsl_sai_hw_params, > + .trigger = fsl_sai_trigger, > +}; [...] > +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver fsl_component = { > + .name = "fsl-sai", > +}; > + > +static int fsl_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ [...] > + > + sai->dma_params_rx.addr = res->start + SAI_RDR; > + sai->dma_params_rx.maxburst = 6; > + index = of_property_match_string(np, "dma-names", "rx"); > + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "dmas", "#dma-cells", index, > + &dma_args); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + sai->dma_params_rx.slave_id = dma_args.args[1]; > + > + sai->dma_params_tx.addr = res->start + SAI_TDR; > + sai->dma_params_tx.maxburst = 6; > + index = of_property_match_string(np, "dma-names", "tx"); > + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "dmas", "#dma-cells", index, > + &dma_args); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + sai->dma_params_tx.slave_id = dma_args.args[1]; The driver should not have to manually parse the dma devicetree properties, this is something that should be handled by the dma engine driver. > + > + ret = snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev, &fsl_component, > + &fsl_sai_dai, 1); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = fsl_pcm_dma_init(pdev); > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sai); > + > + return 0; > + > +out: > + snd_soc_unregister_component(&pdev->dev); > + return ret; > +} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html