On 5/20/24 12:20, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
Before enabling copy for dm target, check if underlying devices and
dm target support copy. Avoid split happening inside dm target.
Fail early if the request needs split, currently splitting copy
request is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/dm.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/device-mapper.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
index cc66a27c363a..d58c67ecd794 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
@@ -1899,6 +1899,38 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_nowait(struct dm_table *t)
return true;
}
+static int device_not_copy_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
+ sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
+{
+ struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(dev->bdev);
+
+ return !q->limits.max_copy_sectors;
+}
+
+static bool dm_table_supports_copy(struct dm_table *t)
+{
+ struct dm_target *ti;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < t->num_targets; i++) {
+ ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i);
+
+ if (!ti->copy_offload_supported)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * target provides copy support (as implied by setting
+ * 'copy_offload_supported')
+ * and it relies on _all_ data devices having copy support.
+ */
+ if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
+ ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_not_copy_capable, NULL))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int device_not_discard_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
{
@@ -1975,6 +2007,11 @@ int dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
limits->discard_misaligned = 0;
}
+ if (!dm_table_supports_copy(t)) {
+ limits->max_copy_sectors = 0;
+ limits->max_copy_hw_sectors = 0;
+ }
+
if (!dm_table_supports_write_zeroes(t))
limits->max_write_zeroes_sectors = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 597dd7a25823..070b41b83a97 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1717,6 +1717,13 @@ static blk_status_t __split_and_process_bio(struct clone_info *ci)
if (unlikely(ci->is_abnormal_io))
return __process_abnormal_io(ci, ti);
+ if ((unlikely(op_is_copy(ci->bio->bi_opf)) &&
+ max_io_len(ti, ci->sector) < ci->sector_count)) {
+ DMERR("Error, IO size(%u) > max target size(%llu)\n",
+ ci->sector_count, max_io_len(ti, ci->sector));
+ return BLK_STS_IOERR;
+ }
+
/*
* Only support bio polling for normal IO, and the target io is
* exactly inside the dm_io instance (verified in dm_poll_dm_io)
diff --git a/include/linux/device-mapper.h b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
index 82b2195efaca..6868941bc7d9 100644
--- a/include/linux/device-mapper.h
+++ b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
@@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ struct dm_target {
* bio_set_dev(). NOTE: ideally a target should _not_ need this.
*/
bool needs_bio_set_dev:1;
+
+ /* copy offload is supported */
+ bool copy_offload_supported:1;
};
void *dm_per_bio_data(struct bio *bio, size_t data_size);
Errm. Not sure this will work. DM tables might be arbitrarily, requiring
us to _split_ the copy offload request according to the underlying
component devices. But we explicitly disallowed a split in one of the
earlier patches.
Or am I wrong?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
