Hi Reinette, On 5/7/24 15:26, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Babu, > > On 5/6/2024 10:18 AM, Moger, Babu wrote: >> On 5/3/24 18:24, Reinette Chatre wrote: >>> On 3/28/2024 6:06 PM, Babu Moger wrote: >>> >>>> a. Check if ABMC support is available >>>> #mount -t resctrl resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl/ >>>> >>>> #cat /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mbm_assign >>>> [abmc] >>>> legacy_mbm >>>> >>>> Linux kernel detected ABMC feature and it is enabled. >>> >>> Please note that this adds the "abmc" feature to the resctrl >>> *filesystem* that supports more architectures than just AMD. Calling the >>> resctrl filesystem feature "abmc" means that (a) AMD needs to be ok with >>> other architectures calling their features that are >>> similar-but-maybe-not-identical-to-AMD-ABMC "abmc", or (b) this needs >>> a new generic name. >> >> It should not a problem if other architecture calling abmc for similar >> feature. But generic name is always better if there is a suggestion. > > "should not a problem" does not instill confidence that AMD is > actually ok with this. The feature "ABMC" has been used in the public document already to refer this feature. https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/24594.pdf If there comes a conflict then we can change it to amd_abmc. Didn't see any conflict at this pint. -- Thanks Babu Moger
