On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 06:19:34PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 09:44:15AM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > +struct riscv_isa_vendor_ext_data_list {
> > > + const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext_data;
> > > + struct riscv_isainfo *per_hart_vendor_bitmap;
> > > + unsigned long *vendor_bitmap;
> >
> > It took a lot of digging for me to understand this was the set of
> > vendor extensions supported on all harts. Can we add that to the name,
> > maybe something like isa_bitmap_all_harts? (I wonder if we could drop
> > the vendor part of the name since we already know we're in a
> > vendor_ext_data_list structure).
>
> Reading this made me wonder, why is the all-hart bitmap an unsigned long
> when the per hart one is a riscv_isainfo struct?
Hmm I don't think there is a good reason for that. I believe this can
become struct riscv_isainfo * with no issues.
- Charlie
