After a recent discussion regarding "do we need a 'nobackport' tag" I set out to create one change for stable-kernel-rules.rst. This is now the last patch in the series, which links to that discussion with all the details; the other stuff is fine-tuning that happened along the way. Ciao, Thorsten --- v1->v2: * Add reviewed-by tag from Greg to the first patch. * Change the backport example in 2 as suggested by Greg. * Improve description of patch 3 while also making the change remove a level of indenting. * Add patch explaining stable@xxxxxxxxxx (w/o @vger.) * Move the patch adding a 'make AUTOSEL et. al. ignore a change' flag to the end of the series and use stable+noautosel@xxxxxxxxxx as suggested my Konstantin and ACKed by Greg. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1712812895.git.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thorsten Leemhuis (5): docs: stable-kernel-rules: reduce redundancy docs: stable-kernel-rules: call mainline by its name and change example docs: stable-kernel-rules: remove code-labels tags and a indention level docs: stable-kernel-rules: explain use of stable@xxxxxxxxxx (w/o @vger.) docs: stable-kernel-rules: create special tag to flag 'no backporting' Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 234 ++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-) base-commit: 5eb4573ea63d0c83bf58fb7c243fc2c2b6966c02 -- 2.44.0
