[PATCH v2 0/5] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no stable backport' tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



After a recent discussion regarding "do we need a 'nobackport' tag" I
set out to create one change for stable-kernel-rules.rst. This is now
the last patch in the series, which links to that discussion with
all the details; the other stuff is fine-tuning that happened along the
way.

Ciao, Thorsten
---
v1->v2:
* Add reviewed-by tag from Greg to the first patch.
* Change the backport example in 2 as suggested by Greg.
* Improve description of patch 3 while also making the change remove a
  level of indenting.
* Add patch explaining stable@xxxxxxxxxx (w/o @vger.)
* Move the patch adding a 'make AUTOSEL et. al. ignore a change' flag to
  the end of the series and use stable+noautosel@xxxxxxxxxx as
  suggested my Konstantin and ACKed by Greg.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1712812895.git.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thorsten Leemhuis (5):
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: reduce redundancy
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: call mainline by its name and change
    example
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: remove code-labels tags and a indention
    level
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: explain use of stable@xxxxxxxxxx (w/o
    @vger.)
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: create special tag to flag 'no backporting'

 Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 234 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)


base-commit: 5eb4573ea63d0c83bf58fb7c243fc2c2b6966c02
-- 
2.44.0





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux