On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 16:31 +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote: > On 11/10/13 16:25, Joe Perches wrote: > > Printing kernel pointers via %pK has a minor defect when > > kptr_restrict is set to 2: the pointer may be emitted > > as "pK-error" instead of all 0's when in an interrupt. > > NAK. This is not a defect, as I explained earlier. It is really a defect > that it _doesn't_ print 'pK-error' in all cases. 'pK-error' is for > finding kernel bugs. Not my understanding. There is no bug to find when emitting a pointer via %pK. The only issue is that has_capability_noaudit can not be called from an interrupt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
