Re: [PATCH] Documentation: workqueue: Inline WQ_* flag pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/18/24 15:23, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> [+Cc: Jon]
> 
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:21:01 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> - * For detailed information on %WQ_* flags, please refer to
>> + * For detailed information on ``WQ_*`` flags, please refer to
>>   * Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst.
>>   *
>>   * RETURNS:
> 
> In my opinion, reST-specific clutters like these should be avoided in
> kernel-doc comments as far as possible.
> 
> Instead, I think you can educate kernel-doc (script) so that "*" is
> allowed in the %CONSTANT pattern, meaning %WQ_* can be converted
> to ``WQ_*`` in reST.
> 
> For similar changes made against the @param pattern, see commits
> 69fc23efc7e5 ("kernel-doc: Add unary operator * to $type_param_ref")
> and 8aaf297a0dd6 ("docs: scripts: kernel-doc: accept bitwise negation
> like ~@var").
> 

Thanks for the idea!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux