Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2013 12:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> Changes since v3:
>>>     - Switch back to vendor specific DT properties regarding the anti-glitch
>>>       filter configuration, as this IP is the only one having such a filter.
>> Do you agree to keep these properties vendor-specifics?
> My preference is generic bindings. There are no other users right now,
> yet there might be in the future. At least with something similar enough
> that the bindings will apply. Was hoping for some additional input,
> though, but I am not depending on it.
I have to push another revision to change the IRQ flags as reported by 
Stephen G.
I will also revert to generic bindings in this revision.
For their documentation, I will add it as soon as you will have created 
the DT binding documentation of I2C.

Is it okay for you?
>
>> If so, could you take this series for v3.13?
> Sure, if it passes the second review...
For sure!

Regards,
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux