On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 02:32:41PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Add parsing for Zcmop ISA extension which was ratified in commit
> > b854a709c00 ("Zcmop is ratified/1.0") of the riscv-isa-manual.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > index b7551bad341b..cff7660de268 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB 77
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD 78
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCF 79
> > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP 80
> >
> > #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > index 09dee071274d..f1450cd7231e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCB),
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCD),
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCF),
> > + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zcmop, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP),
>
> As per spec zcmop is dependent on zca. So perhaps below ?
>
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCMOP, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCA)
What's zicboz got to do with it, copy-pasto I guess?
If we're gonna imply stuff like this though I think we need some
comments explaining why it's okay.
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA),
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB),
> > __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC),
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
