"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 28.03.24 20:29, Karel Balej wrote: >> Quoting of the '"no regressions" rule' expression differs between >> occurrences, sometimes being presented as '"no regressions rule"'. Unify >> the quoting using the first form which seems semantically correct or is >> at least used dominantly, albeit marginally. >> >> One of the occurrences is obviously missing the 'rule' part -- add it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Karel Balej <balejk@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thx for this: > > Reviewed-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I've applied this patch; part 2, it seems, is subject to further work so I have not applied that one. Thanks, jon
