Re: [net-next v2 2/2] mlx5/core: Support max_io_eqs for a function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:25:49 +0300 Parav Pandit wrote:
> +	query_ctx = kzalloc(query_out_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!query_ctx)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock);
> +	err = mlx5_vport_get_other_func_cap(esw->dev, vport_num, query_ctx,
> +					    MLX5_CAP_GENERAL);
> +	if (err) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed getting HCA caps");
> +		goto out;

missing unlock

And before someone suggests we need guards, even make coccicheck catches
this...

> +	}
> +
> +	hca_caps = MLX5_ADDR_OF(query_hca_cap_out, query_ctx, capability);
> +	MLX5_SET(cmd_hca_cap, hca_caps, max_num_eqs, max_eqs);
> +
> +	err = mlx5_vport_set_other_func_cap(esw->dev, hca_caps, vport_num,
> +					    MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_GENERAL_DEVICE);
> +	mutex_unlock(&esw->state_lock);
> +	if (err)
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed setting HCA caps");
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(query_ctx);
> +	return err;
-- 
pw-bot: cr




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux