> It appears that there is no custom here and it may just be somebody's preference? Reinette, Thanks for digging around. I had thought there was general consensus that memory was measured in 2^20, storage in 10^6 and networking in either 10^6 or 10^9 (but bits rather than bytes. But, as you've found, there doesn't seem to be to be even that much of a custom. Maybe a case for https://xkcd.com/927/ (since it is April 1st, I propose everyone standardize on Teranibbles per fortnight[1] :-) ) But back to the patch. As there is no standard, changing the documentation to accurately represent the code looks like a good option. -Tony [1] 1 MiB/s == 2.5367 Tnibbles/fortnight
