On 10/07/2013 07:05 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:43:49PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> index 39c7838..4fe5b9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ MACHINE_END
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
>> static const char *omap3_boards_compat[] __initdata = {
>> "ti,omap3",
>> + "ti,omap343x",
> ^^^^
> You used omap36xx everywhere, so I guess this should be
> "ti,omap34xx"?
3630 has at least two variants:
http://www.ti.com/product/omap3621
http://www.ti.com/product/omap3630
It got further spun off in 37xx family:
http://www.ti.com/product/dm3730 (DM3730 and DM3725)
3430 is no longer in production - but just had a single version (at
least what I can remember).
3530 variant of 3430 on the other hand has a few:
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/OMAP3_Overview
I am ok to change to ti,omap34xx if folks think that is the right
thing to do. Personally, I might prefer to handle 35xx family slightly
differently considering deltas.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
