On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:43:07 -0700 Rahul Rameshbabu wrote: > > I don't understand. > > Are you sure you changef the kernel to use uint, rebuilt and > > there is no ETHTOOL_A_TS_STAT_PAD anywhere, anymore? > > Sorry, I was not as clear as I could have been with my last reply. I did > leave ETHTOOL_A_TS_STAT_PAD in when I tested (intentionally). I was > trying to mimic other ethtool stats implementations, but you are saying > that in general there is no need for this padding (which I agree with) > and I can remove that unnecessary offset. It'll be different from the > existing stats, but I am ok with that. Yes, the small divergence is fine - uint is pretty recent addition.
