On 3/14/24 00:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Günter,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:06 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add name of functions triggering warning backtraces to the __bug_table
object section to enable support for suppressing WARNING backtraces.
To limit image size impact, the pointer to the function name is only added
to the __bug_table section if both CONFIG_KUNIT and CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
are enabled. Otherwise, the __func__ assembly parameter is replaced with a
(dummy) NULL parameter to avoid an image size increase due to unused
__func__ entries (this is necessary because __func__ is not a define but a
virtual variable).
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
@@ -8,19 +8,30 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+# define HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION
+# define __BUG_FUNC_PTR " .long %0-.\n"
+# define __BUG_FUNC __func__
+#else
+# define __BUG_FUNC_PTR
+# define __BUG_FUNC NULL
+#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
+
#define __EMIT_BUG(x) do { \
asm_inline volatile( \
"0: mc 0,0\n" \
".section .rodata.str,\"aMS\",@progbits,1\n" \
"1: .asciz \""__FILE__"\"\n" \
".previous\n" \
- ".section __bug_table,\"awM\",@progbits,%2\n" \
+ ".section __bug_table,\"awM\",@progbits,%3\n" \
This change conflicts with commit 3938490e78f443fb ("s390/bug:
remove entry size from __bug_table section") in linus/master.
I guess it should just be dropped?
Yes, I know. I'll send v2 rebased to v6.9-rc1 once it is available and,
yes, the change will be gone after that.
Thanks,
Guenter
