On 06.03.24 11:18, Petr Tesařík wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:21:12 +0100 > Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> * Mention ahead of time which version number are meant as example in >> commands used during the step-by-step guide. >> >> Lo! A quick note reg "mention ahead of time which version numbers are >> meant as example in commands used during the step-by-step guide". I did >> that, as I've seen someone following the guide without replacing the >> version numbers, so pointing this out with a few words seemed wise. But >> I'm not sure if the way I did it was the best; if someone has a better >> idea how to do that, please let me know. Ciao, Thorsten > > If you want to make 100% sure that nobody can follow the guide blindly > without replacing the version numbers, use e.g. 2.8... Ha, I kinda really like that idea a lot, but I guess I'd go with something that is closer to real life, like 5.20. Nevertheless at the same time... > Then again, this could also confuse some other folks... > The idea is probably not better. ...this is likely true as well, so I guess we might better avoid going down that path -- unless people here convince me that this is worth it. Ciao, Thorsten
