On Fri Dec 15, 2023 at 1:06 PM EET, David Gstir wrote: > This covers trusted keys backed by NXP's DCP (Data Co-Processor) chip > found in smaller i.MX SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: David Gstir <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 90f13281d297..988d01226131 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -11647,6 +11647,15 @@ S: Maintained > F: include/keys/trusted_caam.h > F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_caam.c > > +KEYS-TRUSTED-DCP > +M: David Gstir <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +R: sigma star Kernel Team <upstream+dcp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +L: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +L: keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +S: Supported > +F: include/keys/trusted_dcp.h > +F: security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_dcp.c > + > KEYS-TRUSTED-TEE > M: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> > L: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> I can for sure put this. The code quality is *not* bad :-) However, your backing story really needs rework. It is otherwise impossible to understand the code changes later on because amount of information is vast, and you tend to forget details of stuff that you are not actively working on. That is why we care so deeply about them. BR, Jarkko
