On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 14:11, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:58 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 21:20, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:06 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [snip] > > > > > --- a/include/linux/tee_drv.h > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/tee_drv.h > > > > > @@ -275,6 +275,17 @@ void *tee_get_drvdata(struct tee_device *teedev); > > > > > struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_priv_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t size); > > > > > struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t size); > > > > > > > > > > +int tee_shm_pool_op_alloc_helper(struct tee_shm_pool *pool, struct tee_shm *shm, > > > > > + size_t size, size_t align, > > > > > + int (*shm_register)(struct tee_context *ctx, > > > > > + struct tee_shm *shm, > > > > > + struct page **pages, > > > > > + size_t num_pages, > > > > > + unsigned long start)); > > > > > +void tee_shm_pool_op_free_helper(struct tee_shm_pool *pool, struct tee_shm *shm, > > > > > + int (*shm_unregister)(struct tee_context *ctx, > > > > > + struct tee_shm *shm)); > > > > > + > > > > > > > > These rather belong to drivers/tee/tee_private.h as we shouldn't > > > > expose them to other kernel client drivers. > > > > > > This is the right place, this .h file is for TEE drivers too. > > > > > > > But this is shared with other kernel TEE client drivers and we > > shouldn't expose internal APIs which aren't meant for them with a side > > effect of API abuse too. Any particular reason to not use > > drivers/tee/tee_private.h? > > drivers/tee/tee_private.h is supposed to be used internally by only > the files in drivers/tee. How about "struct tee_device" being in drivers/tee/tee_private.h? > If you look in include/linux/tee_drv.h > you'll find a few functions and other definitions that a kernel TEE > client driver should not use, for instance, tee_device_register() and > tee_device_unregister(). This kernel TEE client interface was > introduced with commit 25559c22cef8 ("tee: add kernel internal client > interface"). include/linux/tee_drv.h existed before we even had any > kernel TEE client interface. Anyhow, it looks like there is a chance for refactoring here. How about splitting this header further in something like include/linux/tee_core.h which will contain all the pieces relevant to TEE drivers? BTW, this patch series can keep using include/linux/tee_drv.h for the time being. -Sumit > > Cheers, > Jens